![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Adapted from the Crisis Management Handbook: A Guide for Overseas Staff, Peace Corps Volunteer Safety Council) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 CRISIS MANAGEMENT A crisis is any significant event with potentially severe consequences that requires immediate action or response. For the purpose of this Handbook the focus will be on crises of a regional or national scope. The types of regional or national crisis posts may encounter include:
All of these crises have several aspects in common:
Crisis management is the process of preparing for, mitigating, responding to and recovering from a crisis situation. It requires (1) an organized plan to ensure the safety and survival of self and community, and (2) an understanding of the human response to stress. Crisis management is a dynamic process that begins well before the critical event and extends beyond its conclusion. As all those in the field know, there are many kinds of crises, from natural disasters to accidents and injuries to civil unrest, riots, and military coups. Each stage before, during and after a crisis presents special challenges and requires different strategies for effective management.
Experience has shown that preparation, communication and certain administrative procedures are essential in managing a crisis. The same experience has also highlighted the importance of creativity, innovation and the exercise of sound judgment in the face of chaos, absurdity and human frailty. This handbook provides crisis management guidance based on considerable research and decades of Peace Corp experience. It is intended as a resource for the study abroad program administrators in the US and abroad to augment decision making and management skills. The core for the Handbook is presented in three chapters titled Before, During and After the Crisis. The first chapter, Before the Crisis, will provide strategies to help:
The second chapter, During the Crisis, will discuss how to:
The third chapter, After the Crisis, will give advice on how to:
1.2 BARRIERS TO PREPAREDNESS A number of barriers may arise to challenge preparedness efforts. The following are some examples. There is often a general apathy toward emergency preparedness. Lack of public awareness of the threat and a tendency to underestimate the risks involved are major contributors to apathy about preparedness. Competing priorities with daily demands, lack of confidence in the effectiveness of preparatory actions, and ambiguity about who is responsible for preparing also contribute. Disasters and crises are different form routine emergencies. Program administrators and staff are assigned new and unfamiliar duties in a crisis. Everyday procedures and priorities are altered as are divisions of labor and resources. In addition, different agencies are required to work together in ways not previously required. Good communication is essential and almost always a problem. The amount and types of information people need before, during and after a crisis increases significantly form the norm. Lack of standard terminology and everyday "people problems" can lead to misunderstandings, inaccurate information, and misinterpretations. The "Paper Plan Syndrome" can give people a false sense of security. The Emergency Action Plan is an illusion of preparedness unless accompanied by training and practice. 1.3 STRATEGIES TO OVERCOME THE BARRIERS Overseas staffs with crisis experience have suggested some strategies that can be effective in overcoming these barriers to preparedness. Plan for the most likely hazards or crises. Use recent experience to fight apathy. Preparation for more common crises is more likely to receive public support and be cost effective. People pay attention to what they see as relevant. Preparing for likely hazards also provides a training ground for dealing with other emergencies. Develop a basic Emergency Action Plan with response requirements that would be applicable in any situation. While it is impossible to prepare for all contingencies, basic steps must be taken in all emergencies that can be practiced and perfected. Examples are communications, health concerns, information management, transportation, prioritization and coordination, and food and water resources. Key roles must also be defined and assigned to specific individuals or groups. Develop a flexible Emergency Action Plan that progresses in stages with clear indictors for progression from one stage to another. Practice, practice, and practice the Emergency Action Plan. Integrate emergency actions into normal routines. Reporting procedures, communication practices, prioritization and coordination can all be integrated in a standard set of procedures so that they are second nature in times of emergency. Involve the users of the Emergency Action Plan in its development and implementation. Users of the plan are not limited to program administrators, staff, and faculty both at home and abroad, but also other agencies, local government officials, and anyone who might have a role or responsibility in carrying out some part of the plan. The importance of a coordinated process in developing the plan cannot be over-emphasized. It facilitates coordination during the crisis itself. The Emergency Action Plan must look at the big picture. The Emergency Action Plan must take into account all the organizations and persons involved in coping with a crisis. These might include the US Embassy, host country governments, police and military, airport officials, telecommunications, travel agents, news media, missionaries, local hospitals and clinics, etc., and of course, the college or university/study abroad program offices. This is the time to look at the effect of an evacuation on host country nationals and contractors, so that they can be aware of what the college or university/study abroad program can and cannot do for them, and plan accordingly. In summary, emergency action planning and crisis management are processes involving an entire system of people and organizations. 2. BEFORE THE CRISIS: PLANNING Planning is a critical component in crisis management. A comprehensive planning process includes not only creating a plan, but training, rehearsing, coordinating with other agencies, and periodically evaluating and updating the plan. The EAP provides a framework for contingency planning and defines the communication network to be used in an emergency. The college or university/study abroad programs should have an EAP to provide for the safety and orderly withdrawal of staff and students. The EAP is "living document" that will require regular revision as staff and students come and go, or as the general conditions within the country change. The following sections provide guidelines for the process of Emergency Action Planning. 2.1 DEVELOPING AN EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN The Peace Corps EAP is usually a single document that contains 1) an introduction, 2) the basic plan itself, 3) modular extensions or "pull-out" sheets, and 4) any supporting documents or reference materials. There are four basic steps to creating a plan. These are:
Each of these steps is outlined below. 2.1.1 Establishing a Planning Team While the Program Administrator(s) has/have the ultimate responsibility for developing, updating and implementing an Emergency Action Plan (EAP), the plan is part of a larger system that includes the college or university, the study abroad program office abroad and in the U.S., the US Embassy (the Regional Security Officer or RSO), and the larger community. It is therefore most effective to coordinate emergency planning efforts with the Embassy and RSO as key team members. The Emergency Action Planning team should include the users of the plan and representatives from each group or organization that would have a critical role in its implementation. Key members should include the following:
Any document produced should be given broad staff and student review. This will help ensure that all factors are taken into account, and enable staff and students to consider their own contingencies. The primary task of each member of the planning team is to define his/her respective role and responsibilities in carrying out the EAP, including coordination with U.S. Embassy, college or university /study abroad program in the U.S. or abroad, host country government and other agencies and resources. The planning team will also need to define clear lines of authority and their responsibilities to each other in implementing a coordinated effort. To the extent possible, planning team members could also be members of the task force that responds to the crisis. They will already be familiar with the EAP and will have had experience working as an effective team. 2.1.2 Analyzing the Hazards and Capabilities The next step toward creating an EAP involves gathering information about probable emergencies and environmental hazards, and assessing the current capabilities of the system to respond. The following tasks will help you decide what information should be included in the EAP. 1. Review the country's history of recent experiences and identify the potential hazards and emergencies, and where appropriate, when they are likely to occur, in the following areas:
2. Review Program policy and any relevant site documents, such as those focused on:
3. Assess internal resources and capabilities
4. Identify external resources and outside contact groups
2.1.3 DEVELOPING THE PLAN Developing the plan involves:
Following is a sample format outline to guide you through the process of drafting your Emergency Action Plan. 2.2 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN OUTLINE 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION The EAP is usually a single document that contains an introduction, the basic plan itself, modular extensions about specific crises, and any necessary supporting documents. The introduction should:
The EAP should be formatted in such a way that footers are included that indicate the most current review date. Pagination allows for accuracy if the plan is being discussed with administrator(s) or others and/or portions need to be referenced or faxed. Pages should correspond with the table of contents. To guide you through the process of developing in this section, the Emergency Action Plan Checklist is included. The checklist is also used by the program administrator(s) to review the EAPs as they are revised and submitted each year. 2.2.2 Core Content The following are only suggestions for the basic content of an Emergency Action Plan. Each institution within each country/ region, etc. must choose the most relevant information to present and the best way to present it. a. Types of Emergencies Covered. The EAP can cover a range of emergency situations including medical emergencies and evacuation, family crises, accidents and injuries, physical and sexual assaults, natural disasters, environmental hazards, civil unrest and political uprisings, or country evacuations. These emergencies can affect single individuals or the entire group. b. Roles and Responsibilities. It is important to define the chain of command and decision making process in an emergency. This includes the role of the on-site administrator, U.S. college or university/study abroad program administrator(s), the US Embassy and others in responding to a crisis. The functions and responsibilities of each staff member should be clearly defined. It is most useful to refer to positions rather than individuals in defining roles and responsibilities. A Crisis Task Force (often composed of, but not limited to, the members of the EAP planning team) should be established at this point. The task force can help process information, develop contingency plans and provide:
Finally, the students need to know what is expected of them as individuals and members of a group. c. Communication. Effective communication is the key to any crisis management system. Experience indicates that effective communication must operate on several levels: on-site program administrator, host country nationals, country/regional, and U.S. -side institutional administrators. Creating and developing these networks prior to an emergency reduces the chances of breakdown and misunderstanding at the moment of crisis. Students can play a major role in developing a working communications system by:
Explore all possible methods of communication, using local and national resources. It is not unusual for telephones to malfunction during a number of crisis scenarios. Radio stations and government radio networks can be very helpful. Whatever information is provided in the EAP should be complete, specific (who, what, how) and up-to-date. An agreed upon time and schedule for telephone or other contact should also be established and maintained. The frequency of contact will depend on the acuity of the situation and developing circumstances. It is not only important to determine who, where and how communications should take place but what kind of information is needed and the relative urgency of the message. Checking to see if the message was accurate is also very important, especially under conditions of stress. Having the person repeat or write down the message assures better accuracy and reliability. Sending messages via a third party to the U.S. college or university/study abroad program in crisis situations is also important. When sending an emergency message through a third party, keep the following in mind: In any emergency contact where an operator or message taker is involved, please be prepared to provide the following information:
Be sure to stress that this is an urgent or emergency situation! The responsibility of communicating with the families of the students can rest with various administrators. As soon as the evacuation is confirmed, the families of all students should be contacted. It is important to maintain regular contact with students' families throughout the crisis, apprising them of developments as they occur and providing appropriate support. d. Travel and Transportation. Information on travel methods and routes must also be as specific as possible (overland, air, sea, private, commercial, and/or military). Maps demarcating pick-up points, potential landing sites for aircraft and/or helicopter, and estimated travel times under normal circumstances should also be included. Guidance about border crossing should also be provided, crossing and making contact with appropriate authorities in third country. Most importantly, alternative methods of travel and routes must be presented and prioritized in the event that the usual routes are no longer safe or feasible. Student and staff sites should be clearly located on the maps. e. Safety and Health Concerns. The EAP should address basic safety and health precautions, including information about:
f. Administration. The EAP should specify what administrative responsibilities require attention in the event of a crisis. To fulfill these responsibilities it is recommended to have response systems in place before the crisis occurs. The Administrator should:
g. Contingencies. Even the best laid plans cannot factor in all
possible contingencies. Yet probable scenarios that impact on communications
(no telephone lines), transportation (public transport strike), or coordination
(capital city destabilized) should be addressed. Most Peace Corps programs use a three stage model to identify alert status based on the standard established by the US Embassy. Stages should be clearly defined, along with the criteria for progression to the next stage in coordination with appropriate college or university/ study abroad administrator(s) and the Embassy. Specific action plans should be developed for each stage so that students know what to do and what to expect at each step.
It is absolutely essential to be clear about:
2.2.4 Planning for and Managing Specific Crises These could be prepared as separate stages or "pull-outs" to cover different types of emergencies or disasters such as:
"Pull-outs" have the advantage of being readily accessible and containing situation-specific information and action plans. Countries that are at high risk for certain types of natural disasters (hurricanes, earthquakes, nuclear accidents) should consult the appropriate local department for emergency preparedness and obtain technical assistance in preparing for and responding to these hazards. 2.2.5 Checklists Checklists are invaluable in planning and implementing an Emergency Action Plan. They assure completeness and greatly increase efficiency. The following checklists were found to be essential or very helpful by the Peace Corps:
2.2.6 Supporting Documents Supporting documents may include:
2.3 OPERATIONALIZING THE PLAN Operationalizing the plan involves more than implementing it at the time of the crisis. It includes:
2.3.1 Training In order to avoid the "paper plan syndrome" the Emergency Action Plan must be put to use through training and periodic testing. Everyone will require some sort of training on the Emergency Action Plan, but one person or committee should be given the responsibility for planning, implementing and evaluating the training program. The purpose of the training is to:
At the end of training, trainees should know:
Staff training about crisis management should occur at all levels, with personnel in the U.S. and abroad. Once in country or on-site, staff needs to develop specific knowledge and familiarity with people, equipment, geography and procedures in order to implement the plan. Student orientation most often is initiated in the pre-departure orientation program in the U.S. and reviewed at the on-site orientation abroad. However, each program needs to determine who receives the training, who does the training, when and where it should occur, and how to best get the information across. There are a few basic concepts that might prove helpful in designing effective training (training officers will be extremely helpful here:
2.3.2 Testing and Rehearsal Testing and rehearsal serve a training purpose as well as a check on the appropriateness and efficacy of the EAP. It can range form a simple review of procedures to a full scale exercise. While conducting a full scale exercise may often prove impractical, many countries have implemented a system of testing certain components of the EAP such as:
Regardless of how the testing is done, the important thing is to DO IT! The results should be documented and used to revise, update or reinforce the existing EAP. 3. DURING THE CRISIS: ACTION When a crisis occurs, adrenaline begins to pump and energy levels mount. It is important to channel this energy into constructive course so as to avoid conflict and confusion. Delegating functions and tasks into which staff members and students can channel energy include:
The optimum leadership style will be determined by the personal characteristics of the team leader and what the crisis dictates. Successful crisis team leaders have been those who have been open, supportive, flexible and still decisive and directive when the moment warrants. The ability to manage varying levels of conflict-among staff and students, with the media, and demands from U.S. college or university/study abroad program--will be essential. 3.1 EVACUATION As the crisis develops, the country staff will constantly assess the nature and extent of the emergency. If withdrawal appears imminent, the on-site administrator(s) must devote more attention to ensuring the safety of students, staff and dependents.
As students depart for a safe haven country, the following information about each student should be transmitted to the evacuation support team:
The respective roles and responsibilities of the various home offices should be clear. 3.1.1 CLOSING A STUDY ABROAD CENTER DURING EMERGENCY EVACUATION If, as a crisis develops and withdrawal of students appears imminent, the administrator(s) should attempt to follow a study abroad center emergency closing plan. Advise students of need to close bank accounts and settle debts if evacuation takes place (civil disorder or natural disaster may preclude such action); 3.1.2 SUPPORTING CRISIS WORKER During an emergency, crisis task force members and crisis workers function at high intensity for long hours. Symptoms of mental and physical fatigue may go unnoticed until people reach exhaustion. Foreign service national staff, concerned for their families, the effects on their country, and the prospect of perhaps losing their jobs, in addition to the increased stress of coping with Student support matters during a crisis, are at particularly high risk.
In addition to the physical and mental stress of crisis work, the crisis worker may be subjected to a number of other stresses:
During the operation of a crisis task force, a number of strategies can be used to minimize flameout or burnout.
According to the Peace Corps, the U.S. Department of State has an excellent video titled Crisis Work-Crisis Worker. It offers a useful discussion about the special problems of the crisis worker and gives very specific guidelines on remedial or preventive strategies. A copy of the video should be available through the U.S. Embassy. 4. AFTER THE CRISIS: RETURNING TO NORMAL Regardless of the nature and extent of a crisis, it usually has an impact on everyone. The students and staff in the country are profoundly affected by every tragedy and unforeseen crisis that occurs to one of their numbers. The host country nationals and counterparts who work with the students and staff are just as deeply touched by events and will require emotional support and stress relief. The administration and staff of the college or university/study abroad program, students, and family members and friends are all part of the larger community affected by a crisis. All these connections will need continued attention as you return to normal after the crisis. The timely support to students and staff in the immediate aftermath of a crisis is critical. 4.1 DEBRIEFING Some form of debriefing is absolutely necessary for the students and staff after relief from duty or at the conclusion of the crisis event. Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) is an organized approach to managing stress response in those who have experienced a crisis situation. It is used with individuals or groups and consists of three basic components:
There are four types of CISD. Each has its own application but the common goal is to provide support and minimize the development of abnormal stress in emergency or crisis survivors. 4.1.1 The On-Scene or Near-Scene Demobilization is the briefest form of CISD. It is a continuous process conducted during the crisis as shifts change or natural breaks in the action occur. An observer (mental health professional, chaplain, other support personnel) functions as an advisor at the scene of the action and during brief rest periods. The observer should not be involved directly in managing the crisis but is there primarily to support staff and students. The observer also assesses and reports any signs of severe stress and recommends appropriate action. The demobilization process aims to:
4.1.2 The Initial Defusing is the group process (30-45 minutes) provided immediately after a traumatic event, once the individuals are disengaged from the on-scene operations.
The defusing components are as follows: 1. Introduction
2. Exploration
3. Information
4. Aftermath
The defusing process may provide the necessary support to groups or individuals, however it may happen that the defusing will reveal that need for further support. Indicators that additional support may be necessary include:
4.1.3 The Formal CISD is a guided discussion
(2-3 hrs.) of traumatic event occurring 48-72 hrs after the event that aims
to:
The CSID process is delineated into seven distinct stages. It is important to follow all the stages in order to realize optimal effectiveness. The CISD moves the participants form the cognitive level (less threatening to express) through the emotional level (essential to explore and address) and back to the cognitive level (where the participants find comfort). A skilled facilitator or mental health professional is necessary because of the intensity of the emotional content that is often elicited. The seven stages of the CISD process are as follows:
Before debriefing it is important for the intervention team to:
After debriefing it is important for the intervention team to:
The issues likely to emerge for students and staff in the aftermath of an evacuation or program suspension are:
The following actions have proven useful to Peace Corps Volunteers who have survived a crisis or had to terminate service prematurely. It may be useful for study abroad students forced to leave a program early.
4.1.4 The Follow-up CISD is often not necessary but can occur several weeks or months after the event to help with closure and re-entry. This process focuses on achieving closure, attending to unfinished business and looking ahead to a return to "normality" for students and staff. 4.2 RETURNING TO NORMAL Once a crisis event (evacuation, program suspension) has passed, the decision whether to return to the site may arise. Despite the appearance that a critical situation has returned to normal, the crisis may have precipitated many changes, including:
A re-assessment of the post environment and general conditions should be undertaken by the post management team. A determination of the current site can be made through general observations and discussion with the on-site administrator(s), local officials, and other study abroad programs in the area. The decision to return or not to return and the reasoning that supports that decision should be made clear to students and staff, with ample opportunity to discuss concerns and possible consequences. While getting back to everyday routine tasks is an important step in the return to "normality", one should expect and prepare for symptomatic reactions to the post-crisis reality. Some reactions to watch for are:
A re-entry program that provides a supportive forum for staff and students shortly after a return to site should provide a forum to discuss and resolve program and adjustment issues. 5. ATTACHMENTS 5.1 STUDENT PROPERTY INVENTORY CHECKLIST
5.2 Sample Medical Evacuation Procedures _____1. Consult on-site administrator, local doctor, central administrative office, insurance representative, 24-hour hotline to obtain pre-approval for medical evacuation (medevac). _____ 2. If administrator office concurs medevac is necessary, determine
_____ 3. Have college or university/study abroad program arrange transportation/medical support. _____ 4. Inform administrators of any special needs in itinerary such
as _____ 5. Ensure the patient has passport and visa needed for departure from abroad and entry into USA or country enroute. If passport is unavailable, contact US Embassy consul to make another passport or arrange for proper documents. _____ 6. When patient's travel schedule is obtained from administrators, follow-up with the on-site administrator and college or university/ study abroad program. Inform administrator if student wants parents or family notified and /or review pre-departure form to see if student has pre-approved emergency contact(s). _____ 7. Brief patient about medevac procedure going over medevac checklist and reviewing standard medevac handout with student. _____ 8. Prepare patient's medical chart and ensure that all results are translated into English. Instruct patient to carry chart, etc in hand luggage. Include any x-ray or lab results. _____ 9. Make sure patient has any necessary medications or supplies he/she will need along the way. _____ 10. If patient is traveling alone and will need to overnight in a city enroute, remind patient that airline is usually responsible for providing food and lodging while the patient is enroute to destination. Have patient check at airline desk for lodging voucher. _____ 11. If patient is traveling with accompaniment, determine if patient will need to go directly to hospital when arriving at destination. _____ 12. If direct hospital evaluation/admission will be needed, call administrator to determine which hospital and consultants will be used and go there directly from the airport. PROCEDURE FOR MEDICAL EVACUATION WITH EMERGENCY EVACUATION ASSISTANCE COMPANY 1. Contact the company as soon as the decision to medevac the patient is taken.
2. Give insurance company the following information:
3. Develop a medevac checklist in consultation with the insurance company for procedures /practice in case of medical evacuation. 5.3 EMERGENCY SITE LOCATOR FORM
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||